Report Says “False Equity is on the Rise” in Housing Market
ANNAMARIA
ANDRIOTIS
Mar 20, 2015
blogs.wsj.com/developments
Home prices in some U.S. markets are rising much
faster than rental incomes or what it would cost to build new houses in those
markets, according to a new study by a real estate valuation firm.
The growing gap between sales prices, on one
hand, and rents and so-called “replacement cost” on the other is evidence
of markets that are over-heating, said the report by Jacksonville,
Fla.-based Smithfield & Wainwright. “The build-up of false equity is
on the rise again,” the report states.
Using inflation-adjusted data, the firm
concluded that recent sales prices of single-family homes in 13 states and the
District of Columbia are 10% more on average than what the homes would have
been appraised for using two other methods.
One of those appraisal methods is simply what it
would cost to replace the homes. The other method values homes by applying a
multiplier to what those houses would yield in rental income.
Since home prices bottomed out in the second
quarter of 2011, the firm says, sales prices increased 13.2% on average through
the third quarter of last year nationwide. Meanwhile, rent and reconstruction
costs have increased by only 1.9% and 3.3% on average, respectively, the report
said.
During the last housing boom, inflated
appraisals helped contribute to the run-up in home prices. In December, The
Wall Street Journal reported that appraisers
are increasingly being pressured to inflate home valuations.
In the story, the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency expressed concern that some of the mortgages banks are giving out
are based on inflated values. Freddie Mac said it had launched fraud
investigations to determine whether lenders had approved mortgages backed by
inflated home appraisals.
In its report, Smithfield & Wainwright
compared home sales data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency with how much
income homes can produce if rented out (based on data from the Department of
Housing and Urban Development) and how much it costs to rebuild homes if they
are destroyed (based on data from building-cost data provider Marshall &
Swift.)
The gap between prices and the other two
variables increased greatly during the last boom. Nationwide, Smithfield &
Wainwright’s data show that home prices on average increased 36% between the
end of 2000 and the end of 2006 after adjusting for inflation while rent and
reconstruction costs increased 5% and 16%, respectively.
The 13 states Smithfield & Wainwright
identified as the most over-heated currently are Arizona, Colorado, Idaho,
Louisiana, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oregon, South
Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wyoming as well as the District of Columbia.
It also found 8 states where it claims home
sales prices on average are at least 10% lower than they would cost to rebuild:
Alabama, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada and
Ohio.
The appraisal industry says three
factors—comparable sales prices, replacement cost and potential rental
income–should be considered when valuing homes. But some of these factors may
not be relevant to certain appraisals.
For example, the rent factor, may have little
relevance in a market with nothing but owner-occupied homes, says Bill Garber,
director of government and external relations at the Appraisal Institute, an
association of real estate appraisers.